News

The company and its directors, Chandra Devi Biyala, Anil Kumar Bagri, and Jay Prakash Mukhiya, are required to pay the reduced penalty within 90 days. The order also directs the company to rectify the ...
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES, NCT OF DELHI & HARYANA 4TH FLOOR, IFCI ...
The Delhi High Court addressed a petition filed by HVR Solar Private Limited against the Sales Tax Officer concerning the rejection of their application for rectification under Section 161 of the ...
The Rajasthan High Court addressed a writ petition filed by Alkem Laboratories Limited against the Deputy Director of Income Tax (DDIT), CPC, Bangalore, concerning an intimation order under Section ...
The Kerala High Court, after hearing the arguments, dismissed the writ petition. The court emphasized that under the Kerala Building Tax Act, 1975, once a tax assessment order is issued, the assessing ...
The Delhi High Court addressed a petition by Shalender Kumar challenging orders by the Commissioner, Delhi West CGST Commissionerate, that withheld his GST refund. The petitioner had initially faced ...
This appeal by the assessee is filed under Section 66 (1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 for calling in question the order dated 28.03.2024 passed by the respondent herein. 2. The appeal ...
The Rajasthan High Court quashed a prosecution sanction order against Fortune Infovision Pvt. Ltd., an e-commerce company, for a delay in depositing Tax Deducted at Source (TDS). The company had ...
The appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of NFAC/CIT (A) passed u/sec 144 r.w.s.147 and u/sec 250 of the Act. The assessee has raised the grounds of appeal challenging the order of the ...
ii. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in low, the Ld. CIT (Appeals) erred in accepting fresh submission from the assessee and not allowing the AO to examine the additional evidence ...
3. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner inter alia challenging the Orders-in-Original dated 14 th January, 2025 and 3 rd February, 2025 issued by the Office of the Commissioner, ...
Considering the arguments presented, the Rajasthan High Court issued a notice to respondents 1 through 7, with their respective counsels accepting the notice and requesting time for further ...